Legal Opinion
Murov v. Ades
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 29, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*655In an action, inter alia, for an accounting, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Palmieri, J.), dated March 10, 2003, as, after a nonjury trial, determined that certain pending contingent fees obtained by the partnership prior to the date of its dissolution were assets thereof and directed an accounting.
Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In 1976 the plaintiff and the defendant Paul R. Ades (hereinafter the defendant), formed a law firm as equal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shandell v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Kirsch v. LeventhalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Dwyer v. NicholsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Liddle, Robinson & Shoemaker v. ShoemakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- McDonald v. FenzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Development Specialists, Inc. ex rel. Coudert Brothers LLP v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Development Specialists, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Allied Bingo Supplies of Florida, Inc. v. HynesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Sexter v. SexterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Yador v. MowattDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021