Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Ceco Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 1, 1969No. 38435PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Writ of certiorari having heretofore issued, argument having been heard, and the court having examined the record and briefs, it appears that the writ was improvidently issued. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause is discharged. See Conway v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Fla.1966), 185 So.2d 697.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur. ERVIN, C. J., concurs specially with opinion.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conway v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henninger v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Duval Asphalt Products, Inc. v. E. Vaughn Rivers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1975
  4. Goldberg v. Ceco Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971