Legal Opinion

Noble v. First State Bank of Bishop

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 24, 1934No. 9235PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was instituted by plaintiff in error, hereinafter named plaintiff, for the sum of $132, alleged to be for usurious interest paid by plaintiff to defendant in error, hereinafter called defendant. The cause was submitted to the justice of the peace and judgment rendered against plaintiff in favor of defendant. On appeal to the county court, the cause was submitted to a jury on special issues, and on the responses thereto judgment was rendered that plaintiff take nothing and pay all costs. A writ of error has been prosecuted to this court.

In response to the issues submitted, the jury…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. B. F. Dittmar Co. v. AdlesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Schmid v. City Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Schmid v. City Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API