Legal Opinion

In Re Parker

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

Sam T. Parker was appointed and qualified as guardian of Hazel Ernestine Arnold, a minor, according to the provision of the Uniform Veterans’ Guardianship Act, Code, section 8541 et seq. The administrator of the World War Veterans’ Bureau challenged the guardian’s settlement and appealed from the judgment of the county court approving it.

March 8, 1934, the guardian purchased endowment insurance, the contract providing for payment of $6,000' to his ward at the expiration of fifteen years or upon death before maturity to her mother. The contract provided for premiums of $346.14, payable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodard v. BirdTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Hines v. MillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  3. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. WatsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCuiston v. HaggardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  2. Hines v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Wilson v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API