Legal Opinion

Weiss v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 27, 1996No. 95-3358PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm appellant’s conviction in all respects but note that the trial court orally “recommended” that appellant receive alcohol and substance abuse treatment. The trial court’s written order reflects that such treatment was “ordered.” As such, we remand with directions for the trial court to enter a written order conforming to its oral pronouncement. See McBride, v. State, 617 So.2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Tannihill v. State, 559 So.2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

GUNTHER, C.J., and STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tannihill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. McBride v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996