Legal Opinion

Atamanuk v. Wong

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided May 12, 1975PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBentley Kassal, J.

This is a residential nonpayment summary proceeding in which the tenant interposed a defense and counterclaim for rental "overcharge” pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision d of section Y51-11.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. After trial, without jury, I found that the tenant was entitled to a judgment on the counterclaim which included treble damages as to part of the overcharge. (Atamanuk v Wong, NYLJ, Dec 7, 1971, p 18, col 8.)

Tenant has moved, inter alia, for an award of counsel fees to be paid to his counsel, Mobilization for Youth (MFY) Legal Services, Inc., a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Lopez v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974
  3. In re Approval of the Certificate of Incorporation of St. Lawrence County Legal Assistance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pearson v. PearsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Cooper v. MorinNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Entertainment Partners Group, Inc. v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Carole K v. Arnold KNew York Family Court · 1976
  5. Parker 72nd Assocsiates v. IsaacsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API