Legal Opinion

Succession of Sullivan

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 4, 1935No. 33135Published

1Opinion of the Court

ODOM, Justice.

This ease was before us once before. The issues involved were set out in detail in the opinion handed down on October 30, 1933. See Succession of Sullivan, 178 La. 230, 151 So. 190, 191. In that case we said:

“But the evidence in this record does not suffice to show the alleged olographic document to be entirely written, dated, and signed by the testatrix. The proponent alone so testified; no other witness was produced who was familiar with the handwriting of the testatrix and who declared that he recognized the testament as being entirely written, dated, and signed by her.”

Under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Succession of SullivanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API