Legal Opinion
Rochelle Bail Agency, Inc. v. Maryland National Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 17, 1973No. 71-1622PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM J. CAMPBELL, Senior District Judge.
Following a bench trial in the Southern District of Indiana, judgment was entered for the defendants in a diversity-action brought to recover on an indemnity contract. We affirm.
The plaintiff, Rochelle Bail Agency, Inc. (“Rochelle”), as well as the defendants herein are .either bail bondsman, corporate bonding companies or their agents. In mid-1966, a client of third-party defendant Norman Z. Flick, one Sherman Kaminsky, was under federal indictment in the Southern District of New York. Attempting to secure Ka-minsky’s release on bail prior to trial,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Willis Smith and Resolute Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Livingston S. Hiern v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Carr v. SuttonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
- United Bonding Insurance Company v. TuggleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- United States v. PayneDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rochelle Bail Agency, Inc. v. Maryland National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Com. v. Culver, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015