Santa Cruz Bank of Savings v. Cooper
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Twentieth District Court, County of Santa Cruz. Belden, J. The facts are stated in the opinion. After the decision in Department, the appellant filed his petition that the appeal he reheard in Bank, and the application was denied.
1Opinion of the Court
Ross, J.:
Ejectment to recover a lot of land in the city of Santa Cruz. It appears, that, on the 24th of May, 1867, the defendant Frank Cooper was the owner and in the possession of the premises. He was then a widower, and was living there with his family, which consisted of his sister-in-law and his two minor children —a son twenty years of age, and a daughter fifteen years of age. On the day named, he filed a declaration claiming the premises, then worth $3,500, and at no time since exceeding $5,000 in value, as a homestead, and on the 25th of June, 1872, he married his present wife, Lucy S.…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Weaver v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Palmer v. SawyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Stanley v. SnyderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- Union Trust Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Fullerton v. SherrillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.