United States v. Union Gap Irr. Co.
District Court, E.D. Washington
In Equity. Suit by the United States against the Union Gap Irrigation Company.
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, District Judge.
It appears from the bill of complaint in this case that the plaintiff has examined, surveyed, located, and has now in active operation extensive irrigation works for the storage, diversion, and development of water for the reclamation of arid and semiarid lands in Yakima county, under Reclamation Act of June 17, 1902, c. 1093, 32 Stat. 388 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, p. 662); that the plaintiff has availed itself of the provisions of the act of the Legislature of the state of Washington, entitled, “An act relating to the appropriation of waters of the state for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hard v. Boise City Irrigation & Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Williams v. AltnowOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Southern California Investment Co. v. WilshireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Hague v. Nephi Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
- Head v. HaleMontana Supreme Court · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gunnison Irr. Co. v. Gunnison Highland Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
- West Side Irr. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- United States v. West Side Irrigating Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1916