Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Kent
Supreme Court of Georgia
Negligence. Railroads. Damages. Practice. Jurors. Evidence. Charge of court. Before Judge Miller. Bibb superior court. April term, 1890. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Lumpkin, Justice.
1. The testimony m this case was quite voluminous. After a careful examination of it, we find that the following facts indisputably appeared : The culvert under the embankment where the washout occurred, which was near the 126th mile-post from Macon, was constructed in 1858, was properly built, was sufficient in all ordinary storms and freshets to carry off all the water which had to jiass through it, had withstood the storms of nearly thirty years, and immediately preceding the great rain-storm which caused the washout was apparently in a perfectly safe condition. That…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Gates v. Southern Minnesota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. KentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
3Cited by10 opinions
- Neill v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Willis v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Goble v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Dolan v. O'RourkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.