Legal Opinion
Pagan v. Horton
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 27, 1983No. 82-621PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
The trial court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in an action for breach of contract. After reviewing the record and finding no genuine issue as to any material fact, we hold that the trial court committed no error and affirm the award of summary judgment.
I
On June 1, 1979, the parties entered into a contract for the sale of appellants’ home. On July 2 the parties executed an addendum to the contract which provided:
The undersigned parties hereby agree that in consideration for the Purchasers accepting the roof in “as is” condition, the Seller agrees to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Eli M. Spark v. The Catholic University of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Himmelfarb v. GreenspoonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Estate of DanielDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Lynn v. LynnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- District of Columbia v. SerafinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Peddlers Square, Inc. v. ScheuermannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Wayne Insulation Co., Inc. v. Hex Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.