Legal Opinion
Wilson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 26, 1997No. 96-04459PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
693 So.2d 616 (1997)
Edward Lee WILSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-04459.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 26, 1997.
2Per curiam
Edward Lee Wilson appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Only one of the issues he raises, double jeopardy, is facially sufficient and not conclusively refuted by the record before us.[1] The other grounds raised in the motion are without merit and, therefore, that portion of the order is affirmed. As to the double jeopardy claim, we reverse and remand for…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Plowman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Spaziano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Flores v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- C.A.K. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
4Cited by7 opinions
- Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Damion Dykes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Rios v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Rohr v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Hartley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.