Legal Opinion
Mohan v. Puthumana
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 10, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated June 4, 2002, as granted the cross motion of the plaintiff Tyran Russel Mohan for summary judgment dismissing the counterclaim.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the cross motion is denied, and the counterclaim is reinstated.
“A rear-end collision with a stopped or stopping vehicle creates a prima facie case of liability with respect to the operator of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Leal v. WolffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Filippazzo v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Rozengauz v. Lok Wing HaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Green v. Hong Lee Trading, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martinez v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Camarillo v. SandovalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Oguzturk v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Guerra v. CantosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Frazier v. Hertz Vehicles, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.