Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Jackson v. Tuality Community Hospital
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 28, 1994No. 88-13477; CA A80451Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRiggs, J.
I agree with the majority’s disposition of claimant’s argument regarding the Board’s application of the temporary rules. However, I do not agree with the majority’s conclusion that the Board correctly excluded the medical exhibits offered by claimant. Accordingly, I dissent.
ORS 656.268(7), which controls our disposition of this issue, provides:
“If the basis for objection to a notice of closure or determination order issued under this section is disagreement with the impairment used in rating of the worker’s disability, the director shall refer the claim to a medical arbiter appointed by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Scheller v. Holly HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993