Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Wallen v. Miller
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 1957PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bubnett
The Court of Appeals, in a well reasoned and succinct opinion prepared for that Court by Hale, Judge, has stated the proposition here to be determined as follows:
"The question: May private citizens, without the intervention.of the District Attorney, maintain a suit in the nature of quo warranto against an allegedly unfaithful public officer to have him removed from office and declared to be ineligible for the same or similar position for ten years and to obtain a recovery for the use of Hamilton County for the amounts wrongfully paid this officer?”
The Court of Appeals then well analyzes and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Newman v. United States Ex Rel. FrizzellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Olsen v. SharpeTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. v. WardTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Hope v. Hamilton CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. McConnellTennessee Supreme Court · 1879
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bennett v. StuttsTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Jordan v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Pendleton v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Badgett v. BroomeTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- San Ysidro Irrigation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.