Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

South Atlanta Associates, Ltd. v. Strelzik

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1989No. A89A0444Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCarley, Chief Judge

Insofar as the majority holds in Division 2 that summary judgment was erroneously granted in favor of appellee-defendant Strelzik, I concur in the judgment. However, insofar as the majority holds in Division 1 that appellant-plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was correctly denied, I must respectfully dissent.

The following undisputed facts are, in my opinion, material to the disposition of this appeal: Appellee Strelzik is the president of Housecall, Inc. After negotiations, Housecall, Inc., agreed to lease *580premises from appellant. Appellant sent a copy of a lease agreement and a copy of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peacock v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Hill v. John P. King Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. A. C. Alexander Lumber Co. v. BagleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Employers Commercial Union Insurance v. WrennCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Tidwell v. Carroll Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API