South Atlanta Associates, Ltd. v. Strelzik
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCarley, Chief Judge
Insofar as the majority holds in Division 2 that summary judgment was erroneously granted in favor of appellee-defendant Strelzik, I concur in the judgment. However, insofar as the majority holds in Division 1 that appellant-plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was correctly denied, I must respectfully dissent.
The following undisputed facts are, in my opinion, material to the disposition of this appeal: Appellee Strelzik is the president of Housecall, Inc. After negotiations, Housecall, Inc., agreed to lease *580premises from appellant. Appellant sent a copy of a lease agreement and a copy of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peacock v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Hill v. John P. King Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- A. C. Alexander Lumber Co. v. BagleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Employers Commercial Union Insurance v. WrennCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Tidwell v. Carroll Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.