Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Doolittle
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 13, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReid S. Moule, J.
This is a motion by defendants pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the second cause of action of plaintiff’s complaint.
Plaintiff’s second cause of action alleges that the plaintiff is the administratrix with will annexed of the estate of Clara Y. C. Balliett. It states that on September 8, 1940, Clara Y. C. Balliett died and that her husband F. HoAvard Balliett was appointed executor of her estate on September 16,1940. It further alleges that he acted as such executor until his death on Aug-ust 8, 1958. The second cause of action also sets forth that F. Howard…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bischoff v. . Yorkville BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Garvin v. GarvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Locke v. PembrokeNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Grace v. Corn Exchange Bank Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Potter v. GilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rolf v. Blyth Eastman Dillon & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Smith v. SMITH, BARNEY, ETC.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1981
- Raben v. Overseas Barters, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1967