Legal Opinion

Capwell v. Sipe

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided August 1, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Assumpsit. ' On demurrers to pleas in abatement.

1Per curiam

The writ in this case is a writ of summons. The defendants have filed three pleas in abatement. The first sets forth that, at the time of the service of the writ upon them, the defendants were residents and citizens of the city of Cleveland, in the State of Ohio, and were in attendance upon this court in a suit in which Atwood & Co. were plaintiffs and these defendants were defendants, and that these defendants were in the State of Rhode Island solely for the purpose of being in attendance upon said suit. The second plea is like the first, except that it sets forth that the defendants were in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parsons v. ElySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1818

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Livengood v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Guynn v. McDaneldIdaho Supreme Court · 1895
  3. C. Callahan Co. v. Wall Rice Milling Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. United States v. GradwellDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1915
  5. Tootle v. McClellanCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API