Legal Opinion
Gelish v. Dix Hills Water District
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph Farneti, J.
Ordered that this application by petitioner for an order, pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), granting leave to serve a late notice of claim upon respondents, and deeming the notice of claim served with the instant application timely, is hereby denied for the reasons set forth hereinafter.
This is an action to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained by petitioner on July 2, 2007 at approximately 12:00 p.m., when she fell into a water meter well while walking on her property located at 207 Dix Hills Road, Huntington Station, New York.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Felice v. Eastport/South Manor Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Dubowy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Porcaro v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- White v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Morrison v. New York City HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gelish v. Dix Hills Water DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009