Legal Opinion

Judy v. Trollinger

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1924No. 18112PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Plaintiff in error challenges the judgment of the Court of Appeals upon the ground, first, that the act of 1859 under which the sale of the Greene county property was made was invalid and unconstitutional, as being in conflict with Section 19, Article 1, and Section 28, Article 2, of the Ohio Constitution. These provisions of the Constitution, in so far as pertinent, read as follows:

Section 19, Article 1: “Private property shall ever be held inviolate, but subservient to the public welfare. * * *”

Section 28, Article 2: “The General Assembly shall have no power to pass retroactive…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bly v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Bennett v. FlemmingOhio Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hinds v. McNairIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Ohio National Bank v. BooneOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Cutrer v. CutrerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. First National Bank v. WilderMontgomery County Probate Court · 1966
  5. Provident Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. NashOhio Court of Appeals · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API