Legal Opinion

State v. Lewis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 30, 1976No. 76-186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The order suppressing the evidence which the State seeks to review was based upon the trial court’s consideration of a search warrant predicated upon personal observations of the affiant and a confidential informant in a “controlled buy” circumstance. Under the recent decision of the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Gieseke, 328 So.2d 16 (Fla.1976),1 which was not available to the trial court at the time of the entry of the order under review, we are of the opinion that the affidavit in question contained sufficient allegations to establish probable cause for the search in question.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GiesekeSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Gerardi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merit v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. LaChance v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. State v. SolomonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API