Legal Opinion

Roy v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 28, 2006No. AC 26780PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The plaintiff, Paola Roy, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the granting of the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, the Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly rendered summary judgment on the basis that her claim was barred because she failed to commence suit within one year of the date of the loss, as required by the insurance policy. We conclude that the record reflects a material question of fact as to whether the defendant waived its right to enforce the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Cassella v. KleffkeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. Frantz v. RomaineConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2012
  2. Esposito v. DiGENNAROConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Holmes v. General Electric Capital Corp. (In Re Holmes)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2007
  4. J. Wm. Foley, Inc. v. United Illuminating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API