Legal Opinion

KELLY v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 2021No. 2:20-cv-03698Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HUGH KELLY and CHRISTINE CIVIL ACTION KELLY, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated NO. 20-3698 v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC. MEMORANDUM RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND Baylson, J. February 1_0_, 2021 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, Hugh and Christine Kelly (“the Kellys”), bring this action against Santander Consumer USA (“Santander”). Before this Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. Defendant filed a Response and Plaintiffs Replied. For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny Plaintiffs’ Motion to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API