Legal Opinion

Kastil v. Carro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrew Tyler, J.), entered May 18, 1988, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, is unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed, without costs.

Ms. Elaine D. Kastil (plaintiff) commenced, in 1984, a breach of contract action against Mr. Melvin Carro and the law firm of Carro, Spanbock, Pass, Geller, Raster & Cuiffo (firm), and she seeks to recover $4 million in damages.

The verified complaint alleges, in substance, as follows: Shortly after the defendant firm hired plaintiff as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morone v. MoroneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Rhodes v. StoneNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Potter v. DavieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Silver v. StarrettNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Caro Capital, LLC v. KochDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  5. Truman v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API