Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Tommy Royal and Bernadette Costa, Individually and on Behalf of Similarly Situated Individuals v. Judgment Acquisitions Unlimited Inc. (d/B/A Judgment Acquisitions Unlimited) and Michael Zola

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided June 4, 2024No. 2384CV02302-BLS2Published

1Opinion of the Court

SUPERIOR COURT

TOMMY ROYAL AND BERNADETTE COSTA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF SIMILARLY SITUATED INDIVIDUALS v. JUDGMENT ACQUISITIONS UNLIMITED INC. (D/B/A JUDGMENT ACQUISITIONS UNLIMITED) AND MICHAEL ZOLA

Docket:

2384CV02302-BLS2

Dates:

May 24, 2024

Present:

Kenneth W. Salinger

County:

SUFFOLK

Keywords:

DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION BY JUDGMENT ACQUISITIONS UNLIMITED TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

Judgment Acquisitions Unlimited (“JAU”) is a Massachusetts-based debt collector. Tommy Royal and Bernadette Costa claim that JAU and its attorney Michael Zola have engaged in unfair debt collection practices in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Koch v. Compucredit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Yates v. CACV OF COLORADO, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Kaufman v. RichmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API