Legal Opinion

City of West Helena v. Bockman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 2, 1953No. 4-9997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. Seaborn Holt, J.

Dr. James Bockman, appellee, a practicing physician, has, since 1937, operated a Clinic in a structure within that part of the City of West Helena (population 7,000) designated, by a Zoning Ordinance, (No. 494 enacted April 17, 1951) as Residential Zone “A”. The building housing his Clinic is one story, on a lot 66 ft. x 132 ft., and consists of six rooms — an X-Ray room, a laboratory, examining room, one bath room, two waiting rooms (one for white and the other for Negro patients), and a porch, 21 ft. x 8 ft. Appellee’s residence is in another part of the city.

Dr. Bookman made proper…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Little Rock v. Sun Building & Developing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Conway v. Housing Authority of ConwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. City of Little Rock v. Fausett & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  3. Moffatt v. City of Forrest CitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Williams v. KuehnertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. City of Little Rock v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API