Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Delgadillo

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 2005No. E034767, E037122Published

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

GAUT, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

I concur in the majority’s opinion on all of the issues raised with the exception of its conclusion there was sufficient evidence to support the Penal Code section 12022, subdivision (c) enhancement alleging defendant was personally armed with a firearm during the commission of the crime of manufacturing methamphetamine.

Defendant was convicted of manufacturing methamphetamine, possessing analogs with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine, and possessing *1576methamphetamine for sale. He was also found guilty of being personally armed with a firearm in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. ReavesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. People v. MendivalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API