Legal Opinion

Appel Vending Co. v. 1601 Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1964No. Appeals, Nos. 230 and 231PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

The appellees in these cases entered judgments against the garnishee-appellant for failure to file answers to interrogatories. The garnishee has appealed from the discharge of its rules to strike and open.

1. The garnishee seeks to have the judgment in favor of Appel Vending Company stricken off because that company’s interrogatories directed to the garnishee were entitled “Interrogatories in Aid of Execution under Pa. E. C. P. No. 3117A”. It argues that the only sanctions provided for failure to answer interrogatories under Eule 3117(a) are those provided by Pa. E. C. P.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. FLEMING v. QuaidSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Albright v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Saint Vladimir Ukrainian Orthodox Church v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Graziano Const. Co., Inc. v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Boyles v. SullivanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Gangi v. Delco Cab Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API