Greenblatt v. Johannssen
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLeon D. Lazer, J.
In this action to recover for personal injuries suffered in an automobile accident which occurred after the effective date of the Comprehensive Automobile Insurance Reparations Act (Insurance Law, art. XVIII; now firmly imbedded in legal jargon as the “ no-fault ” law), the defendants have pleaded as affirmative defenses: 1) improper service of .process; and 2) that the plaintiffs “ have failed to meet the requirements as set forth in Article 18 of the Insurance Law relating to the right to maintain an action at law. ’ ’ The plaintiffs have moved to dismiss both defenses, but the defendants…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Shalem v. TeitelbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Altman v. Queens Transit Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1978
- Davis v. Pathe Cab Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1975
- Hopkins v. MargoliasAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1978
- Moren v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978