Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Mancill

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Escambia Probate Court. Heard before Hon. W. E. Rushing. Being under a charge of murder and committed to jail by virtue of a warrant issued by a justice of the peace, Jesse Mancill made application by habeas corpus for bail. From an order denying the writ he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPelham, P. J.

The tendencies of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor and petitioner, respectively, on the hearing of the application for bail, were conflicting.

Having the proper regard to the weight which should, in such case, be accorded by the revising court to the judgment of the primary tribunal, when the same is presented for review on appeal (Ex parte Sloane, 95 Ala. 22, 11 South. 14; Ex parte McAnally, 53 Ala. 495, 25 Am. Rep. 646; Ex parte Nettles, 58 Ala. 268), it cannot be held that the record presents a case where it is clear that the judge of probate was in error in denying bail.

We refrain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte McAnallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Ex parte NettlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Ex parte SloaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte OliveAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API