Legal Opinion

Bank v. Dibrell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM WHITE. Appeal in erlor from Circuit Court of "White County. W. M. Hammock, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLurtoN, J.

This is an action against an in-dorser upon a note payable to and at People’s National Bank, McMinnville.

The notice of demand and non-payment sent by the Notary Public to the indorser was, in form, proper. It was signed, however, by no one. This was probably inadvertent. It was, for this defect, insufficient as notice. ' The notice of non-payment, and that the holder will look to the indorser, must be given by the holder, his agent or attorney. An unsigned notice sent by mail is not a notice by the holder or his agent. This was so ruled in 16 Cal., 375. A notice signed by the Notary, by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Klockenbaum v. PiersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Henderson v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. First National Bank of Henderson v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API