Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Cornelison v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 12, 2013No. CR-10-1297Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWelch, Judge

This case- is before us on return to remand, and the majority dismisses Christian Emerson Cornelison’s appeal as moot. I agree that the issue regarding trial counsel’s failure to challenge the search warrant and the issue regarding the sentence were resolved below and are now moot. I disagree with the majority as to its resolution of the third issue — whether trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to file a motion to withdraw Cornelison’s guilty plea.

The case before us originated as a Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition. The circuit court dismissed the petition and, on appeal, this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API