Legal Opinion

Kopmeier v. Larkin

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1879Published

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. Foreclosure of a mortgage, against O’Neil, Larkin and others. Larkin appealed from an order after the sale, but before confirmation thereof. The nature of that motion will appear from the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTayloe, J.

This is an appeal from an order made in the same action in which the defendant Thomas O’Neil appealed from the order confirming the sale made therein, and xipon which appeal this court has reversed such order for the reason stated in the opinion filed in that case. Larkin, the appellant in this case, made a motion in the court below to restrain the plaintiff from proceeding to collect any part of the deficiency upon the judgment after the application of the proceeds of the sale to the satisfaction thereof, for reasons set forth in his motion. The circuit court denied his motion, and he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. StarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Richard v. WaltonNew York Supreme Court · 1815
  3. Cairns v. O'BlenessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Arnold, Duncan & others v. SandfordNew York Supreme Court · 1817
  5. Palmer v. YagerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API