Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Krassin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 29, 1878PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Waseca county, Lord, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

It is alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff, by defendant’s permission, purchased, in defendant’s name, a town lot for two hundred and fifty dollars, paying seventy dollars thereon, and taking a contract of purchase in defendant’s name, upon defendant’s promise to hold the lot in trust for plaintiff, and to transfer the same to him when requested. It is further alleged that the defendant executed in duplicate the contract of purchase, and that he refused to deliver and *118assign the same to plaintiff when requested; and that in disregard of his promise, and without the consent or knowledge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. MurrayNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Green v. DrummondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  3. Durfee v. PavittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Randall v. ConstansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Lamb v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. La Du-King Manufacturing Co. v. La DuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. Haaven v. HoaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API