Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lumpkins v. Lumpkins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1975No. 12227Published

1DissentPhillips, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case with instructions to set aside to appellant whatever part of the retirement benefits necessary for a just and equitable division of the property.1

Section 3.63 of the Vernon’s Texas Family Code Annotated requires the trial court in a suit for divorce to order a division of *494the estate of the parties in a manner that the court deems just and right, having due regard for the rights of each party and for any children of the marriage. I would hold that the retirement benefits are a part of the estate subject…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mora v. MoraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Womack v. WomackTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. North Texas Producers Association v. Keith YoungCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  4. Kirkham v. KirkhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Garrett v. Reno Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API