Legal Opinion

Van Olinda v. Hall

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from special term. Action by Josephine Van Olinda against Mary B. Hall. From an order denying a motion for a bill of particulars of plaintiff’s claim, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMayham, P. J.

The complaint alleges, in substance, that the defendant, on or about the 15th day of December, 1893, and on divers other days and times up to the commencement of this suit, wrongfully intending to injure the plaintiff, and deprive her of the support of her husband, enticed him away from the residence of the plaintiff to that of the defendant, and divers other places, and there has ever since boarded, maintained, harbored, and kept her husband against her will, and that during that time, by wiles, arts, and evil endearments bestowed upon him by the defendant, has alienated his affection from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Young v. De MottNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Dueber Watch-Case Manufacturing Co. v. Keystone Watch-Case Co.New York Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Constable v. HardenberghNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hazard v. BirdsallNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hoeninghaus v. ChaleyerNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mayer v. MayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Loeb v. LoebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Groff v. HaganCity of New York Municipal Court · 1895
  4. Mayer v. MayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Toomey v. WhitneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API