Legal Opinion

Molina v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 16, 1977No. 77-288PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

The sentence of the court, while indicating appellant was to receive credit for time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1) Florida Statutes (1975). Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

The record also indicates appellant was sentenced to prison “at hard labor.” To be imprisoned “at hard labor” is improper because no existing statute…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API