In re Penn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Bar Association of the City of New York.
1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.
The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York in November, 1919, and has practiced as such since his admission. On September 14, 1920, on behalf of a client he wrote a letter *765to a lady demanding, on behalf of his client, the return of a diamond engagement ring and other valuables, with a statement that the recipient of the. letter was liable for criminal prosecution, but that if she returned the property no further proceedings would be taken. The respondent admits the sending of the letter, admits that it was an improper letter and that…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Pace v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Gasca v. Texas Pipe Line Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- In re GelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930