Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Scully

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1967No. Civ. 24032PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, P. J.

Plaintiff James Bradley brought this action to obtain a decree quieting his title to a parcel of San Francisco real property and canceling a deed in favor of defendants John Scully and Ruth Cottle. Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal from a judgment decreeing that defendants Scully and Cottle -are the owners of an undivided one-half interest in the property in question and are tenants in common with plaintiff.

The facts are undisputed.

On August 29, 1927, plaintiff James Bradley entered into a contract to purchase a parcel of real property located on Westgate Drive in San Francisco -and made a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kachigian v. KachigianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Shive v. BarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. California Bank v. SchlesingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Kaupe v. KaupeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of GrigsbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Grigsby v. Lloyds Bank CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API