Legal Opinion
United States v. Bland
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 20, 1958No. Civ. 9389PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
Defendants (the Blands) have moved for judgment in their favor at the close of plaintiff’s case in this action brought by the United States as assignee of the Blands’ promissory note. This note had been endorsed without recourse by TriTilt Storm Window Company, the original payee, to Baltimore Federal Savings & Loan Association, and thereafter assigned by the Loan Association to the United States. It had been given in connection with an instalment sale of storm windows and doors by Tri-Tilt to the Blands, and had been insured under Title I of the National Housing Act, 12…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Waddell-Entz Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Stride v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- United States v. HansettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Griffin v. Baltimore Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Jones v. Third Nat. Bank of SedaliaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anderson v. Peoples Security Bank of MarylandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- United States v. BlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. William E. Bland and Katherine BlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958