Legal Opinion

Baskin v. Andrews

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Herman C. Baskin and others, heirs of William R. Baskin, deceased, against John P. Andrews and others, to enjoin the enforcement of a certain judgment against said decedent. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMacomber, J.

The questions presented by this appeal arise mainly from facts alleged in the complaint and admitted by the answer. One Mary E. Husnu. as principal maker, with James L. Brewer and William R. Baskin, (the latter now deceased,) as sureties, did, on the 22d day of February, 1876, execute and deliver their joint and several promissory note to the defendant An*442drews, and to James Huntington, now deceased, of whose last will the defendant Huntington is executor, in the sum of $800, payable on the 1st day of March thereafter. After the maturity of the note action was brought thereon by the payees,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. . DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Randall v. . SackettNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Risley v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Potts v. BaldwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Getty v. Town of HamlinNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. People ex el. Nash v. FaulknerNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API