Legal Opinion

Schneeberger v. Hoette Concrete Construction Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1984No. 48339PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant homeowner appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant concrete subcontractor in a breach of contract suit. The contract for the construction of plaintiff’s home was between plaintiff and Tri Co, Inc., the general contractor.

Defendant was granted a summary judgment on two grounds. First, the court held that plaintiff’s claim was barred by Rule 55.32(a) because it was not made as part of *302a compulsory counterclaim in a prior suit brought by the general contractor against this plaintiff. Second, the court held that because the issue raised in this claim…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Prentzler Ex Rel. Frazee v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. Knight v. M.H. Siegfried Real Estate, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Bishop v. United Missouri Bank of CarthageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Harris v. NolaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tongay v. Franklin County Mercantile BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Jorgensen v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Shinn v. Bank of CrockerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Northwest Radiation Oncology v. GoodstalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Bankcard Systems, Inc. v. Miller/Overfelt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API