Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Detroit Bedding Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 6, 1931No. 5668PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Suit for infringement of claim 21 above of Fowler patent, No. 1,332,550, for a padding bandage. The defenses were invalidity and noninfringement. If the patent is valid (which we need not decide), the invention consists in so tapering and overlapping the ends of the bat that when it is folded about the core a bandage of uniform thickness results, or in the simplicity with which the bandage is manufactured, by merely tapering the ends of the bat before folding it. For such á product the appellant has limited the claim to “tapered edges lapped on one side of the p aper core” and he is bound…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Lakewood Engineering Co. v. SteinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
  3. McCallum v. Pittsburgh & Cleveland Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
  4. Michigan Engine Valve Co. v. Monarch Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Atlas Mineral Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. Thompson Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API