Legal Opinion

Spindler v. Toomey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1953No. 28,978PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Appellants brought this action to quiet title to the use of a certain alleged private roadway running through their property, and to restrain and enjoin appellees from using said roadway and from removing barriers and signs designating it as a private road. Appellees, via cross-complaint, sought to establish said roadway as a public road and to restrain appellants from erecting signs designating it as a private road and in any way interfering with appellees’ use thereof.

Finding and judgment was for defendants (appellees).

The sole question here presented is whether the road in question has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SwartzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. McHenry v. FouttyIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Pitser v. McCreeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Cozy Home Realty Co. v. Ralston, Rec.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Michigan Central Railroad v. City of Michigan CityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Columbia Realty Corporation v. HarrelsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Discher v. KlappIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Fenley Farms, Inc. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Zakutansky v. KanzlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API