Legal Opinion

Gleichman v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1928No. Docket No. 3PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

In the summer of 1919 the plaintiff and one Harry Garson were engaged in conducting a motion picture theater in the city of Detroit, known as the Broadway Strand. The Famous Players-Lasky Corporation (a New York corporation, hereafter called the defendant) was then engaged in producing and distributing high grade films for such pictures. It desired to arrange for the exclusive exhibit of its pictures in one of the Detroit theaters for a term of years, and to that end entered into negotiations with plaintiff and Garson. Garson was unwilling to enter into such a contract, and an arrangement was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Beecher v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Keiswetter v. RubensteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Richardson v. . HughittNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Kokesh v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Place v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  2. Carroll v. CaldwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hathaway v. Porter Royalty Pool, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Byker v. MannesMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Detachable Bit Co. v. Timken Roller Bearing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API