Territory of Arizona ex rel. Sherman v. Board of Supervisors
Arizona Supreme Court
MANDAMUS. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
By statute approved February 25, 1885, it was enacted that the qualified voters of Mohave county should, at the next general election, designate by ballot the locality for the county-seat of said county; that at said election any voter might designate upon his ballot a place for such county-seat, and that all such votes should be received, counted, and returned as other votes; and that the place receiving the highest number of votes should be the county-seat. All acts in conflict with that act are hereby repealed.
The petition, on the relation of Charles E. Sherman, alleges that at the last…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barto v. . HimrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Ex parte WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- State ex rel. Willard v. StearnsNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
- Boren v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- People ex. rel. Cuthbert v. Common Council of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. PhelpsArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Moreno v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Graham v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Moore v. City of PageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.