Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1960No. 6659Published

1DissentStruckmeyer, Chief Justice

So that my differences with the majority may be clarified, some of the material facts will be emphasized. Lot 10 is a tract of land, rectangular in shape, approximately 320 ft. x 600 ft., acquired by the Blacks in December of 1944. The first transfer from the Blacks was the north one half of lot 10 to appellants Clarence J. Smith and Thelma B. Smith. The deed from the Blacks to the Smiths did not in any manner pretend to bind this parcel of land (parcel 1) to the 1944 restrictions. Since the Declaration of the 1944 Restrictions does not purport to cover lot 10, it cannot be seriously urged…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Dula Dashiell Cockrell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Harley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API