Trent v. International Railway Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
! Edgcomb, J. (dissenting).
I cannot concur in the decision about to be rendered. I place my dissent upon an error in the charge relating to the duty of the motorman in the operation of his car. Subdivision 12 of section 81 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, relating to the duty of the driver of a vehicle or street surface car upon approaching a hospital, firehouse or school, was read to the jury, and they were told that the motorman was bound to operate Ms car “ in accordance with the statute with extreme care.”
■ The respective plamtiffs were not persons for whose protection this provision of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ConartySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Nolan v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Bell v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- Harty v. . Central R.R. Co. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.