Commonwealth v. DiPietro
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
Following a thorough colloquy with the defendant on December 19, 1989, a judge accepted the defendant’s plea to indictments alleging trafficking in cocaine in an amount over one hundred grams (G. L. c. 94C, § 32E[fi]) and possession with intent to distribute marihuana (G. L. c. 94G, § 32C). In January of 1992, the defendant filed a pro se motion for a new trial, claiming that he was ineffectively represented by counsel in various respects. A judge, who was not the judge who had accepted the pleas, denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing and filed a memorandum of decision explaining…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ComitaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. PintoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. NoonanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.